R-loops, formed by RNA–DNA hybrids and displaced single-stranded DNA, were historically considered transcriptional by-products. Increasing evidence links them to transcription regulation, chromatin remodeling, and genome instability. The study aimed to profile R-loops at high resolution using DRIPc-seq across human and mouse cells, to determine their prevalence, conservation, and association with chromatin states.
Technique: DRIPc-seq (DNA–RNA immunoprecipitation with cDNA conversion and sequencing) was performed alongside DRIP-seq for comparison.
Samples: Human Ntera2 (embryonal carcinoma) cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts and stem cells.
Controls: RNase H digestion confirmed that detected signals were genuine RNA–DNA hybrids.
Analyses: Genome-wide profiling of DRIPc-seq peaks, correlation with gene expression (RNA-seq), and integration with epigenomic data (ENCODE histone modifications, DNase hypersensitivity, FAIRE-seq).
Prevalence: R-loops occupied ~5% of the human genome (~70,000 peaks) with a median size of 1.5 kb.
Dynamics: R-loops formed co-transcriptionally and were rapidly resolved after transcription inhibition, supporting dynamic turnover.
Conservation: Strong conservation was observed across human and mouse genomes, particularly at CpG island promoters and transcription terminators.
Chromatin states: Promoter R-loops correlated with open chromatin, CpG islands, H3K4 methylation, and DNA hypomethylation.
Terminal R-loops associated with enhancer- and insulator-like signatures involving CTCF and cohesin.
Conserved R-loop formation across human and mouse genomes detected by DRIPc-seq.
DRIPc-seq revealed that R-loops are abundant, dynamic, and conserved genomic features. They preferentially form at promoters and terminators of poly(A)-dependent genes, influencing transcription termination and chromatin structure. Rather than being accidental by-products, R-loops represent a programmed component of mammalian chromatin with regulatory potential.

Rigorous quality control measures are included at each stage. Negative and positive controls confirm specificity, and sequencing depth is optimised to balance sensitivity with cost efficiency.
R-loop peaks were classified into promoters, exons, introns, and intergenic regions, providing an overview of genomic distribution.
Pie chart showing the proportion of R-loop peaks located in promoters, exons, introns, terminators, and intergenic regions.
Bar chart comparing the observed fraction of R-loop peaks (red) with the expected fraction based on genomic length (blue).
Average R-loop peak density plotted around transcription start sites (TSS) and transcription end sites (TES), showing enrichment at gene boundaries.