Understanding how cells regulate translation requires more than standard tRNA seq. Most workflows measure tRNA abundance but overlook two essential layers: extensive nucleotide modifications and the charging status that determines whether a tRNA is translation-ready. Our aa-tRNA (Mim-tRNA) sequencing service addresses these gaps by integrating Mim tRNA seq protocol, modification-informed signatures, and controlled biochemical steps to infer aa-tRNA charging with high precision.
This service is designed for research teams that require accurate, modification-aware tRNA profiling across various conditions, including amino acid starvation, stress responses, genetic knockouts, or drug perturbations. By combining structural relaxation, TGIRT reverse transcription, and isoacceptor-aware mapping, our workflow delivers quantitative readouts of tRNA abundance, modification patterns, and aminoacylation levels in a single experiment.
What we solve for your team

Our aa-tRNA (mim-tRNA-seq) platform is designed to quantify tRNA molecules with high accuracy across eukaryotic systems. The method integrates structure relaxation, TGIRT-driven readthrough, and isoacceptor-aware alignment to address challenges specific to tRNA, such as extensive modifications and high gene similarity. This enables reliable detection of tRNA abundance and modification signatures, even in samples with diverse cell states or stress conditions.
Our workflow extends mim-tRNA-seq to measure aminoacylation levels through controlled biochemical treatments. By comparing protected (charged) and deacylated tRNA under matched conditions, we infer aa-tRNA charging with high sensitivity. This enables researchers to evaluate translation-ready tRNA pools and study how nutrient shifts, stress, or genetic perturbations alter charging dynamics.
Our platform provides three layers of information in a single service:
This integrated readout helps teams interpret translation efficiency, codon bias, and tRNA regulatory mechanisms more effectively than single-dimensional approaches.
Total tRNA abundance does not reflect translational capacity. Only aminoacylated tRNAs can participate in protein synthesis, making aa-tRNA a direct indicator of how efficiently a cell can translate specific codons. Measuring charging levels shows which tRNA species are functionally available under defined biological conditions.
Aminoacylation responds within minutes to nutrient deprivation, oxidative stress, and metabolic perturbations. By comparing charged and deacylated tRNA profiles, researchers can identify bottlenecks in translation caused by amino acid shortages or altered metabolic states. This information complements transcriptome and proteome measurements, especially when mRNA and protein levels diverge.
Charging defects often arise from changes in tRNA synthetase activity or mutations affecting substrate recognition. Monitoring aa-tRNA levels helps determine how these changes impact translation efficiency, fidelity, and global protein output. The approach is equally valuable for investigating modification-dependent stability, as some tRNA species lose charging capacity when specific modifications are disrupted.
Charging dynamics influence the rate at which ribosomes decode specific codons. Low charging levels for a given isoacceptor can slow ribosome movement and shape protein expression. For teams studying codon-dependent translation, metabolic regulation, or stress-responsive pathways, aa-tRNA data provide essential context for interpreting ribosome profiling, proteomics, and gene expression datasets.

1. Sample QC: Assess RNA integrity and purity; confirm small-RNA preservation.
2. Structure relaxation: Apply conditions that reduce secondary structure without damaging modifications.
3. Reverse transcription (TGIRT): Generate cDNA while retaining modification-linked signatures.
4. Library construction: Ligate adapters and amplify under bias-controlled cycles.
5. Sequencing (Illumina): Produce high-depth reads suitable for quantitative mim-tRNA-seq.
6. Biochemical contrasts for aa-tRNA: Sequence protected and deacylated preparations under matched conditions.

1. Read QC and trimming: Remove adapters; evaluate quality metrics and length profiles.
2. tRNA reference build: Use a species-matched, curated reference with mature sequences and CCA tails.
3. Multi-mapping alignment: Assign reads using strategies tailored to paralogous tRNA families.
4. Quantification: Report isoacceptor and isodecoder abundance with robust normalisation.
5. Modification calling: Derive position-specific misincorporation signatures for modification profiling.
6. Charging estimation: Compare protected versus deacylated profiles to infer aminoacylation levels.
7. Statistics and visuals: Generate differential analyses, heatmaps, and publication-ready figures.
For broader tRNA-seq needs beyond aa-tRNA analyses, you may also consider our tRNA sequencing service or focus on epitranscriptomic mapping via our tRNA modification sequencing service.
"Pipeline illustration showing the aa-tRNA mim-tRNA-seq workflow from sample QC to sequencing and bioinformatics analysis."
| Analysis module | What it includes |
|---|---|
| Read QC and tracking | Adapter trimming, base-quality profiles, duplication, length distributions |
| Reference mapping | Multi-mapping–aware alignment to curated isoacceptor/isodecoder sets |
| tRNA abundance | Normalised counts at isoacceptor and isodecoder resolution |
| Modification signatures | Position-specific misincorporation profiles from mim-tRNA-seq |
| aa-tRNA charging estimation | Protected vs deacylated model; per-tRNA charging proportion |
| Differential analyses | Condition comparisons for abundance, modifications, and charging |
| Structure-aware mapping | Read and signature overlays on cloverleaf schematics |
| Quality metrics | Replicate correlations, saturation curves, library complexity |
| Integrated report | Methods, QC, key results, and interpretation guidance |
| Sample type | Minimum input | Quality criteria | Storage & shipping | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total RNA | ≥ 1–2 µg per sample | OD260/280 1.8–2.1; RIN ≥ 7; intact small RNAs | Aliquoted, RNase-free tubes; ship on dry ice | Preferred for mim-tRNA-seq and aa-tRNA-seq |
| Cultured cells | ≥ 1×10⁶ cells | High viability before harvest; rapid lysis or extraction | Pellets snap-frozen; ship on dry ice | Avoid RNase contamination and repeated freeze–thaw |
| Tissue | 10–20 mg | Prompt stabilisation after collection; no thaw cycles | Cryopulverised or intact pieces; ship on dry ice | Use RNase-free homogenisation methods |
| Model organisms | Human, mouse, yeast, plants | Species-matched references available | Coordinate for strain or ecotype details | Non-model species supported on request |
| Control sets | Protected + deacylated | Same biology, matched handling | Ship together with distinct labels | Required for aa-tRNA charging estimation |
| Not recommended | FFPE or heparinised material | May impair reverse transcription or mapping | — | Contact us for feasibility checks |
Selecting the right method is essential when working with highly structured, heavily modified RNAs. The table below compares aa-tRNA (mim-tRNA-seq) with common approaches used to study tRNA abundance, modification, and aminoacylation. The goal is to help research teams choose a strategy aligned with experimental questions such as modification mapping, charging estimation, or isoacceptor-level quantification.
For background on the strengths and limitations of each workflow, you may also refer to our educational article on tRNA sequencing methods and technical challenges.
| Feature | Standard RNA-seq | Small RNA-seq | LC-MS/MS | mim-tRNA-seq (our platform) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tRNA abundance | Low accuracy due to RT stops | Partial detection | Not suitable | High accuracy (isoacceptor & isodecoder) |
| Modification detection | No | No | Direct modification IDs | Yes, via misincorporation signatures |
| Aminoacylation (charging) | No | No | No | Yes, using protected vs deacylated designs |
| Resolution | Gene-level | Fragment-level | Modification-level | Single tRNA species (isoacceptor/isodecoder) |
| Secondary structure handling | Poor | Moderate | Not applicable | TGIRT readthrough preserves accuracy |
| Comparative studies | Limited | Limited | Moderate throughput | Ideal for stress, KO, drug, and metabolic studies |
| Throughput & scalability | High | High | Low | High (Illumina) |
| Typical use cases | Transcriptomics | Small RNA profiles | Modification mapping | Integrated abundance + modification + charging |
Charging levels influence how rapidly ribosomes decode specific codons. Projects examining codon usage, elongation bottlenecks, or proteome shifts can use aa-tRNA data to determine whether limited charging contributes to reduced translation of selected transcripts.
Aminoacylation responds to amino acid availability and metabolic flux. Comparing protected and deacylated preparations reveals how nutrient restriction, metabolic inhibitors, or signalling pathway perturbations reshape translation-ready tRNA pools.
Environmental stresses—including oxidative stress, heat shock, and hypoxia—affect both modification patterns and charging behaviour. aa-tRNA (mim-tRNA-seq) helps quantify these changes and supports integration with ribosome profiling or proteomics.
Mutations or inhibitors that affect tRNA synthetase activity can lead to reduced charging or altered selectivity. Monitoring aa-tRNA levels provides direct insight into enzyme fidelity, substrate competition, and global impacts on translation.
Certain modifications stabilise tRNA structures or facilitate accurate aminoacylation. Defects in these modifications can cause rapid decay or reduced charging. Combining modification signatures with aa-tRNA measurements clarifies how modification loss affects tRNA lifespan.
Projects analysing cancer progression, neurodegeneration, stem cell differentiation, or immune activation can quantify shifts in the tRNA landscape and determine whether misregulation of charging contributes to altered protein synthesis.
We focus on structured and heavily modified RNAs. Our team is experienced in mim-tRNA-seq optimisation, TGIRT-based readthrough, and biochemical designs required for accurate aa-tRNA analysis.
We maintain curated, species-specific tRNA references and apply multi-mapping strategies tailored to isoacceptor and isodecoder groups. This ensures reliable quantification across highly similar tRNA genes.
Our platform provides coordinated wet-lab and computational support. Each project includes standardised QC, modification-aware alignment, charging estimation, differential analysis, and publication-ready visuals.
We offer consistent quality control, clear communication, and transparent documentation. Each project is assigned a dedicated coordinator, ensuring smooth sample handling and on-time delivery.
References: